|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficient anamnesis: |
|
|
» |
|
Taking patients history is simplified. |
» |
|
The questionnaire can be prepared by the patients themselves. Patients can draw the locations of their complaints and summarize them. Less gets forgotten. |
» |
|
Through the structured query the information becomes standardized and comparable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good documentation: |
|
|
|
|
» |
|
The complete questionnaire corresponds to a "clinical radiography". |
» |
|
Standard for medical reports, easy storage in the patient file |
» |
|
Helpful documentation of the clinical situation for a second opinion / Legal issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple outcome measurement: |
|
|
|
|
» |
|
Score before and after treatment are comparable |
» |
|
Relative effect per patient (REPP)=(score before-score after)/score before |
» |
|
New onset complaints are easily recognized easy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|